COMPARING PUBLIC UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES’ SERVICES: EVIDENCES FROM AR-RANIRY ISLAMIC STATE UNIVERSITY AND SYIAH KUALA UNIVERSITY BANDA ACEH

Authors

  • Candra Adi Kurnia Universitas Islam Negeri Ar Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Saiful Akmal Universitas Islam Negeri Ar Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Siti Nur Zalikha Universitas Islam Negeri Ar Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Eka Januar Universitas Islam Negeri Ar Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Radhiyatussuraya Universitas Islam Negeri Ar Raniry Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v13i01.246

Keywords:

Public University, Library Services, UIN Ar-RAniry, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Abstract

Banda Aceh is the provincial capital of Aceh and has been declared as an economic mobility and education center. This period was marked by the establishment of several public and private schools, as well as public and private universities. Education is a process of learning that aims to develop a generation to be more reliable and capable. Facilities and infrastructure are critical components of education. An essential educational facility for both students and educators is the library. As a public institution, the library must comply with applicable rules and regulations namely UU No. 25 of 2009. The purpose of this study is to establish public services at the UIN Ar-Raniry and USK libraries. This research employs a qualitative approach. The findings indicated that the two libraries were extremely capable of providing services to these public institutions. Numerous supporting aspects contribute to the creation of satisfactory service. Additionally, there are various obstacles to the implementation of public services. Minor errors that occur in each institution are a constant source of progress that must be developed over time. This study concludes that public services provided to UIN Ar-Raniry and USK libraries have begun to show results in compliance with UU No. 25 of 2009. However, further efforts are required on the side of the library's internal and external stakeholders to ensure that the implementation of future services sincerely achieves the law's standardization

 

References

Bove, L. L. (2019). Empathy for service: benefits, unintended consequences, and future research agenda. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-10-2018-0289

Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: Review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610105762

Cox, J. (2018). Positioning the academic library within the institution: A literature review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3–4), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1466342

Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913882

Finn, A., & Kayande, U. (1997). Reliability assessment and optimization of marketing measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151863

Himayah, H. (2013). Layanan dan Pelayanan Perpustakaan: Menjawab Tantangan Era Teknologi Informasi. Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 1(1), 1–6.

Irvine, C., & Levin, T. (2000). Quality of security service. Proceedings of the 2000 Workshop on New Security Paradigms - NSPW ’00, 91–99. New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/366173.366195

Jati, P. (2018). Perencanaan Prasarana Perkantoran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Judokusumo, S. (2007). Pengantar Derivatif Dalam Moneter Internasional. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Khanifah, L. N., & Nurmandi, A. (2019). Determining Public Value of Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 23(1), 109–122.

Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(2), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566690910971445

Lee, L., Lee, M. J., & Dewald, B. (2016). Measuring the customers’ perception of tangible service quality in the restaurant industry: An emphasis on the upscale dining segment. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 19(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2016.1129216

Lodenstein, E., Dieleman, M., Gerretsen, B., & Broerse, J. E. (2013). A realist synthesis of the effect of social accountability interventions on health service providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness. Systematic Reviews, 2(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-98

Marx, A., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2013). The origins, development, and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The first 25 years. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 115–142.

Menor, L. J., & Roth, A. V. (2007). New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 825 846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.07.004

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Nugraha, L., Yuniar, Y., & Harsono, A. (2015). Usulan peningkatan kualitas pelayanan jasa pendidikan bahasa Inggris menggunakan metode Service Quality (SERVQUAL) di LBPP LIA Martadinata kota Bandung. Reka Integra, Jurnal Online Teknik Industri Itenas, Bandung, 3(1), 61–72.

Nyakurerwa, A. T. (2021). Institutional Repository as a Knowledge Management Tool for the Enhancement of Library Visibility in the 21st Century. In Handbook of Research on Information and Records Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 81–93). Pennsylvania: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7740-0.ch006

Phillips, R., Benoit, C., Hallgrimsdottir, H., & Vallance, K. (2012). Courtesy stigma: a hidden health concern among front-line service providers to sex workers. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(5), 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01410.x

Pratama, A. B., & Hidayah, A. N. (2019). Does Public Service Motivation Matter to Employees’ Performance and Organizational Commitment in Sub-district Offices? JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 23(1), 1–15.

Seirin, W. (2006). Identitas dan Ciri Khas Pendidikan Kristen di Indonesia antara Konseptual dan Operasional. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.

Sheeraz, M., Khattak, A. K., Mahmood, S., & Iqbal, N. (2016). Mediation of attitude toward brand on the relationship between service brand credibility and purchase intentions. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 10(1), 149–163.

Shi, Z., & Shang, H. (2020). A review on quality of service and SERVQUAL model. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Copenhagen, Denmark, 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50341-3_15

Tersiana, A. (2018). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Grasindo.

Theoharakis, V., & Hooley, G. (2003). Organizational resources enabling service responsiveness: Evidence from Greece. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(8), 695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.06.009

Trivedi, D., & Bhatt, A. (2019). Quest for quality: Assessment of service quality of special academic institution library: Case study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2019-0004

Twum, K. K., Adams, M., Budu, S., & Budu, R. A. A. (2022). Achieving university libraries user loyalty through user satisfaction: The role of service quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1825030

Webster, C., & Sundaram, D. S. (2009). Effect of service provider’s communication style on customer satisfaction in professional services setting: The moderating role of criticality and service nature. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040910946369

Witara, K. (2015). Cara Singkat Memahami Sistem Manajemen Mutu ISO 9001:2015 dan Implementasinya. Sukabumi: Jejak Publisher.

Wulandari, C., & Satrianansyah, S. (2019). Implementasi metode SERVQUAL untuk layanan jasa jalur Nugraha Ekakurir Express kota Lubuklinggau. Jurnal TAM: Technology Acceptance Model, 10(2), 122–132.

Ydo, Y. (2020). Inclusive education: Global priority, collective responsibility. PROSPECTS, 49(3–4), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09520-y

Downloads

Published

2023-08-10

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.