ANALISIS STUDI KOMPARASI PENYELENGGARAAN INOVASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI ERA NEW NORMAL

  • Muhammad Eko Atmojo Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Helen Dian Fridayani National Cheng Kung University
  • Vindhi Putri Pratiwi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
Keywords: Public service, Innovation, Local Government

Abstract

Public services are the face of a bureaucracy or organization, besides that, public services must also be followed by the latest innovations so that the work pattern of the bureaucracy can be easier and more transparent. Problems since the COVID-19 pandemic, public sector services have encountered extraordinary obstacles, so there must be innovations provided by the government to facilitate and accelerate the implementation of services to the community. In the era of the pandemic and the new normal, there are many city district governments that make the latest innovations to provide the best service for the community, including in Jakarta, Bandung, Semarang, Yogyakarta and Surabaya. These cities also received awards from the ministry with various awards from the innovation sector. The purpose of this study is to analyse a comparative study on the implementation of public service innovations in the new normal era. This research was conducted using qualitative methods and using research tools to process secondary data. The tool used in this study is Nvivo 12+, the data taken in this study is the processed result of data taken through online media in the five cities. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that many public service innovations have been formed in the five cities. As for how to measure innovation in the five cities using public service indicators, including providing solutions, compatibility, usefulness, sustainability, novelty, can be operated. From the results of data processing carried out, especially based on the indicators of public services used, the principle of providing solutions and benefits becomes the indicator with the highest assessment for each city. So, it can be concluded that the public services provided during the pandemic are very useful and on target. Suggestions and recommendations from the results of this study are the need for a change in the stigma for public service providers so that they can adapt quickly to the dynamics of changing conditions.

References

Agranoff, R. (2014). Reconstructing bureaucracy for service: Innovation in the governance era. In Public innovation through collaboration and design. Routledge.

Albury, David. 2003. Inovasi di Sektor Publik. Jakarta : PT Elex Media Komputindo

Anyebe, A. A. (2018). AN OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF PUBLIC POLICY. 13(1), 1–14.

Dergiades, T., Milas, C., & Panagiotidis, T. (2020). Effectiveness of Government Policies in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3602004

Eggers, W., Flynn, M., O’Leary, J., & Chew, B. (2020). Governments’ response to COVID-19 from pandemic crisis to a better future.

Fadilla, P. (2012). New Public Governance. Malang: UB Press.

Heriani, F. N. (2020, March). Kebijakan dan Kesigapan Pemerintah Kunci Tangani Dampak Covid-19. Hukumonline.Com.

LAN RI. (2013). No Title. Jakarta.

Larassaty, L. (2020). Kunci Sukses Ridwan Kamil Lindungi Jawa Barat dari Covid-19 hingga Dinilai sebagai Wilayah Paling Responsif. GridHealth.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.

Mahmudi. 2010. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN.

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Ed). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Niskanen, W. A. (2017). Bureaucracy & representative government. Routledge.

Noblecourt, M. (2019, January). Policy Network. Public Network.Org.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Tahunan 2020 : Mengawal Pelayanan Publik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. In Ombudsman.Go.Id.

Pusat Pelatihan dan Pengembangan dan Kajian Hukum Administrasi Negara LAN RI .(2020). Strategi Pencegahan dan Penindakan Trading in Influence dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. http://aceh.lan.go.id/hasil-kajian/

Pusat Pelatihan dan Pengembangan dan Kajian Hukum Administrasi Negara LAN RI .(2021). Pencegahan Maladministrasi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik Sektor Perizinan. http://aceh.lan.go.id/hasil-kajian/

Raharjo, R. (2020, April). 7 Langkah Pitulungan untuk Percepatan Pencegahan dan Penanganan Covid-19 di DIY. Tribunnews.Com.

Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2018). Organizational Behaviour. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Said, M. Mas’ud. 2007. Birokrasi di Negara Birokratis. Malang: UMM Press. Hal 27

Salam, R. (2021). Perubahan dan Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Di Era New Normal Pandemi Covid-19 Changes and Innovations in Public Services in the New Normal. 3(April), 28–36.

Salim, A. (2006). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Taira Wacana.

Wahyu, Y. (2020, April). Penanganan Covid-19 di Mata Warganetd. Kompas.Id.

Wati, N. K. (2021). Tipologi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil (Disdukcapil) Kota Tangerang Selatan Di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal of Government, 6(2), 89–110.

Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
Eko Atmojo, M., Helen Dian Fridayani, & Vindhi Putri Pratiwi. (2021). ANALISIS STUDI KOMPARASI PENYELENGGARAAN INOVASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI ERA NEW NORMAL. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 11(02), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v11i02.192